Showing posts with label regular. Show all posts
Showing posts with label regular. Show all posts

07 November 2013

Jonathan Martin's critics expose themselves as retrograde cretins

By DA | at
(Guest post by Ben Valentine)

image
Here’s what we know about the situation currently roiling the Miami Dolphins and the National Football League.

Jonathan Martin, a second-year offensive lineman, left the Dolphins to deal with an issue which apparently came to a head after several teammates all got up from his table at a team meal.

Richie Incognito, a veteran offensive lineman, left a voicemail which included a racial slur, threats to Martin’s family, and threats to defecate into Martin’s mouth. Another teammate — or Incognito (it’s not clear) — left at least one message saying he would “run a train” on Martin’s sister.

Here’s what we don’t know for certain, but only know based on leaks.

— Dolphins coaches told Incognito to toughen up Martin.

— Certain Dolphins thought Incognito was “blacker” than Martin and appeared to like Incognito more.

— Jeff Ireland, the Dolphins general manager, told Martin’s agent that Martin should punch Incognito. Apparently, he’s not alone.

— Ryan Tannehill, the Dolphins quarterback, said he thought Martin would consider Incognito a great friend.

— Brian Hartline, a Dolphins wide receiver, said Martin played the voicemail and laughed about it.

— Lydon Murtha, a former Dolphins offensive lineman, said that Martin was taken under Incognito’s wing and that the “extortion” of $15,000 was Martin trying to bail out of paying money fronted beforehand for a Las Vegas trip.

— Martin appears to have voted for Incognito for the Dolphins leadership council.

It seems impossible for all of the leaks to have been accurate. The last four especially seem to contradict Martin’s claim. But it’s quite possible for all of these statements to be at least partially true. In fact, I’d go so far as to say most of the leaks have a degree of truth to them — though the Murtha piece is by far the most dubious for reasons that are laid out by Pro Football Talk.

If you don’t understand how these leaks could all be true, I encourage you to read Drew Magary’s accounts of his bullying at Deadspin. Then go back and look at what Martin’s high school coach said about him:


“He always wanted to make everybody happy and make friends and not be a problem,” Eumont said. “All of his teachers loved him. All of his teammates loved him. His nickname was Moose and he was happy to have that. He was always ‘yes or no sir,’ do whatever you ask him to do. I can see where somebody that’s a bully will take advantage of him, and rather than him say anything would just hold it inside. “I can see where if somebody was bullying him he would take that to heart, and be concerned and think it was his fault.”


It’s easy to see how this could have happened. Martin, by the accounts of pretty much all of his Stanford teammates (and even the Dolphins who are trashing him) is an introverted guy. The coaching staff of the Dolphins thought Martin lacked the “right” mentality, so they sicced Incognito on him. Incognito went full-bore, berating him, never really considering that his actions would be more detrimental than motivational. The rest of the offensive line had no problem with him doing this — or, if they did, they didn’t feel comfortable saying anything.

As Incognito kept layering on the insults, Martin, wanting to be accepted, went along with it. He may have even played the voicemails for others, hoping someone would pipe up, “That’s not cool, Richie.” But when they didn’t, he tried to fit in and laugh. The anxiety built for months, but he kept trying to fit in. He even tried to show he wasn’t bothered by voting for Incognito to be on the leadership council and making it known that that he had.

But it didn’t work.

Eventually, he couldn’t take it anymore and a final prank set him off. Martin left the team, filed a complaint, and here we are.

Ultimately, the Murtha piece illustrates the core issue at play. As PFT pointed out, Murtha was almost certainly repeating someone else’s talking points, simply because he was only around Incognito and Martin for about four months in 2012. The things being talked about happened months after Murtha’s release, making it impossible for him to have seen them firsthand.

Murtha’s piece boils down to a justification of juvenile antics. In his defense of Incognito he, more or less, explains how Martin could have reasonably decided he had to leave for his own safety. It’s in the text (all emphases below mine):


Which brings me to my first point: I don’t believe Richie Incognito bullied Jonathan Martin. I never saw Martin singled out, excluded from anything, or treated any differently than the rest of us. We’d have dinners and the occasional night out, and everyone was invited. He was never told he can’t be a part of this. It was the exact opposite. But when he came out, he was very standoffish. That’s why the coaches told the leaders, bring him out of his shell. Figure him out a little bit.


Set aside that Murtha is again talking about less than a half a year of experience with Martin, he confirmed the Dolphins coaches told the leaders to get on Martin’s case. He tried to downplay it, make it seem like a good-natured suggestion, but even if you are inclined to believe in Incognito’s good intentions, Murtha also confirmed that the coaches erred in telling Incognito to deal with Martin. Look at Murtha’s next paragraph:


That’s where Incognito ran into a problem. Personally, I know when a guy can’t handle razzing. You can tell that some guys just aren’t built for it. Incognito doesn’t have that filter. He was the jokester on the team, and he joked with everybody from players to coaches. That voicemail he sent came from a place of humor, but where he really screwed up was using the N-word. That, I cannot condone, and it’s probably the biggest reason he’s not with the team right now. Odd thing is, I’ve heard Incognito call Martin the same thing to his face in meetings and all Martin did was laugh. Many more worse things were said about others in the room from all different parties. It’s an Animal House. Now Incognito’s being slandered as a racist and a bigot, and unfortunately that’s never going to be wiped clean because of all the wrong he’s done people in his past. But if you really know who Richie is, he’s a really good, kind man and far from a racist.


Martin couldn’t handle it and Incognito didn’t have the ability to let up. That’s a euphemistic way of saying Martin was being made miserable on the directives of out-of-touch coaches. Worse, Murtha repeated the “he laughed at being called a nigger” charge. He could have saved everyone time by simply writing, “Saying nigger is really wrong, but you don’t understand, everyone was okay with it!” (In fairness to Murtha, Hartline, who looks pretty white to me, said the same thing). In Murtha’s view, Martin’s reaction can’t be explained as trying to fit in and make the harassment go away.

There’s also this little gem:


The silliest part of this story, to me, is the incident at the cafeteria, in which Martin was supposed to have been hazed when everyone got up from their seats as he sat down. Whoever leaked that story failed to share that getting up from a packed lunch table when one lineman sits down is a running gag that has been around for years. It happened to me more than once, and it happened to Martin because guys on the team say he was overcoming an illness. Just like when a guy is hurt, the joke is, I don’t want to sit with you, you’ve got the bug. Perhaps for Martin it was the straw that broke the camel’s back, but when Incognito reached him after he stormed out, Martin told him the departure had nothing to do with Incognito. Martin said it was something else. Then the media onslaught began.


This paragraph is why, despite my distrust of Mike Florio, I agree with him that Murtha is parroting a talking point. There is no way he could have known about this incident with any level of confidence without talking to a Dolphins player. It’s also why Sports Illustrated should be ashamed of itself for actually attempting to portray this as an unbiased testimonial. Not only has Murtha given a blow-by-blow account of something that happened when he wasn’t there, but he’s given a supposed insider’s account of Martin and Incognito’s relationship, even though he hasn’t been around for months, and even though he explicitly admitted he doesn’t talk to Martin regularly.

Here’s more Murtha derp-itude:


Incognito was made a scapegoat for the hell coming down on the Dolphins organization, which in turn said it knew nothing about any so-called hazing. That’s the most outlandish lie of this whole thing. The coaches know everything. The coaches know who’s getting picked on and in many cases call for that player to be singled out. Any type of denial on that side is ridiculous. I have friends on more than a dozen teams, and it’s the same everywhere. What people want to call bullying is something that is never going away from football. This is a game of high testosterone, with men hammering their bodies on a daily basis. You are taught to be an aggressive person, and you typically do not make it to the NFL if you are a passive person. There are a few, but it’s very hard. Playing football is a man’s job, and if there’s any weak link, it gets weeded out. It’s the leaders’ job on the team to take care of it.


And now the fun really begins. This passage is a key piece of evidence pointing to Incognito as Murtha’s source, because the coaches are thrown under the bus. But again that interests me less than the bottom of the paragraph. That’s where Murtha confirmed and attempted to justify Martin’s bullying.


The most unfortunate thing about this situation is the consequence it will have on the careers of both men. Richie’s marked himself now as a racist and a bigot, and unfortunately that could be the end of it. Martin is on the opposite end of the spectrum, but no more likely than Incognito to return to the NFL if he wants. In going to the media with his problem, Martin broke the code, and it shows that he’s not there for his teammates and he’s not standing up for himself. There might be a team that gives him a chance because he’s a good person, but the players will reject him. They’ll think, If I say one thing he’s going to the press. He’ll never earn the respect of teammates and personnel in the NFL because he didn’t take care of business the right way.
What fans should understand is that every day in the NFL there are battles between players worse than what’s being portrayed. This racial slur would be a blip on the radar if everything that happens in the locker room went public. But all over the league, problems are hashed out in house. Either you talk about it or you get physical. But at the end of the day, you handle it indoors.



There it is. Despite the fact an NFL locker room is a mess of intolerance, slurs, and a host of horrors you can’t possibly comprehend for your own sanity, in Murtha’s view, Martin committed a major sin by going to the press (he didn’t — the press dug it up after seeing that Martin had left) and airing the dirty laundry. However, that logic only goes so far, even on its own terms. For example, I’d love to know why it’s okay for Incognito to file a grievance against the Dolphins when he could have just punched Ireland in the face and avoided the risk of the press finding out.

Murtha painted a picture of a guy who couldn’t handle the heat and abuse co-workers launched his way out of a desire to toughen him up “or bring him out of his shell.” And when he couldn’t handle it, he responded by breaking a sacred code. Ignore that this code provides cover for an environment so offensive that racial slurs and threats of defecation and violence against people not in the locker room would be considered small-time. Ignore that one person who was in a locker room like that last season is alleged to have committed a murder. Ignore that one person who was in a locker room like that did murder his girlfriend and child and then committed suicide in the team parking lot.

Imagine trying that logic in any other workplace. “You just don’t understand — you’re not a doctor. If you were, you’d understand why federal laws need not apply here.”

Make no mistake, Jonathan Martin was bullied and put in a terrible, possibly illegal, work environment. And the bullying continues. Will it end with a forced recanting or will heads roll?

I suspect there will be a settlement, and the Dolphins and Incognito will give some half-hearted apology alongside Martin, who will add that the differences were cleared up and he’s ready to move on. Neither Martin nor Incognito will play for the Dolphins again. I suspect they’ll both be out of the league for good within two years.

No matter what the Dolphins want to say, Richie Incognito has a terrible track record. He’s was kicked out of two colleges, left negative impressions at multiple NFL stops, has used racial slurs more than once and, sadly more importantly, he’s on the wrong side of 30 and on the decline. He’s simply not worth the headache, not when new information about his sterling character keeps emerging.

There are a good number of players who won’t want Martin around either. His teammates certainly seem like they don’t. It’s possible his old coach, the 49ers’ Jim Harbaugh, who openly says he supports Martin, will give him a chance. But Martin hasn’t been a great pro either, so if he doesn’t turn it around quickly, when he does play again, his leash will be short.

Hopefully, something else happens. Hopefully, the stench of this case forces the NFL to change. That it doesn’t just become the choice of a coach like the Seahawks’ Pete Carroll, or the Bears’ Marc Trestman, or the Eagles’ Chip Kelly, that the NFL, as a league, starts punishing teams that allow this culture to continue. That will happen eventually. In the technological age we live in, you can’t bury this stuff forever.

It would just be nice if the change started sooner, rather than later.

Ben Valentine was born on Valentine’s Day. Really.

(Image cc-licensed: "MIA_vs_OAK_008" by June Rivera)

16 October 2013

My final offer is this: nothing

By DA | at

Given Erick Erickson’s prior admission that he straight-up lied to his readers in order to play partisan cheerleader in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election, why does anyone give credence to anything he writes anymore? Here’s his latest example, posted on October 7:



Republicans are winning the shutdown fight, and Democrats know it…



The polls are shifting against the Democrats. They will continue to shift as more and more Americans realize that this fight is fundamentally about the letter they just received informing them of massive premium increases.


That analysis was, in a phrase, laughably wrong. Here’s CNN’s recap of what happened to Republicans.


To put it in pop culture terms, the best explanation for what happened that I’ve heard is that the Democrats were Michael Corleone, and the Republicans were Pat Geary.


"You can have my answer now, if you like. My final offer is this: nothing."







This can’t keep happening to conservative Americans without an eventual reckoning. That the GOP, as an organization, managed to breeze right past the presidential election without honestly re-evaluating their own strengths and weaknesses will keep coming back to bite them as long as they maintain their insularity.

25 September 2013

The argument against paying NCAA football and basketball players that the NCAA and schools can't make

By DA | at

There seems to be a movement among some college sports fans who can’t embrace the idea of paying players that the least the NCAA can do is allow those players to take endorsement money. I’m not sure precisely how I feel about applying that idea in the current environment, but for now I’d like to point out there is A reasonable logic to “maintaining amateurism” and preventing endorsements based on athletic ability — the NCAA and school administrations are simply in no position to defend that logic, because they’re ************** and ******** of hypocrisy.


The argument would go something like this: <rhetorical>Schools exist to educate. Intercollegiate athletics are non-essential to schools’ mission to educate. “Amateurism” is to protect against academic malfeasance.


If a student attended, say, Boston College solely because he was there to play football, and he was paid money to play football, whether that’s by the school or an outside entity, that cheapens the value of a Boston College education by making football the reason that student is there. That’s the sort of environment in which academic cheating happens, because the education becomes something to be endured or worked around in order to play sports.


The current scholarship-for-play model is based on the idea that the scholarship is the most valuable part of the transaction, and Bobby Middle Linebacker has chosen to attend BC because of BC, not because BC is a way station to something else.</rhetorical>


We know that’s not how big-time NCAA sports actually work, but I can see the principles behind it.

21 September 2013

College education and the NCAA

By DA | at

There may be a way to kill the NCAA — corrupt institution that deserves to be dynamited — and at the same time address the problem of skyrocketing college costs. I can’t be the first person to think of this, but I could be one of a relative few who would be perfectly happy jettisoning the NCAA in the service of improving universities’ finances and, by extension, their students’.


This would have to start with a public university system, which could then lead to changes at private institutions.


1 — Beef up the junior colleges. Under this plan, junior colleges will become equal partners with full universities.


2 — In the public university system, allow any student who lives in a junior college’s “district” to attend, like an optional public high school. Students may fail and fail and fail, but because it’s optional, they can keep coming back and trying to earn their credits and paying their tuition. It’s key to create “districts” for JUCOs because…


3 — *Deep breath* Make the full universities in the public system only responsible for the final two (standard) years of college education; that is, they will only offer major-specific classes. Admissions to these schools will still be competitive, but will be based on students’ performance in junior college.


Junior colleges can offer their Associate Degrees and a litany of general education and prerequisite classes for a fraction of the cost that full universities charge for those same classes. Leverage that.


Students who test out of prerequisite classes in high school wouldn’t have to take those junior college classes. Some would probably end up at full universities a semester, or even a year early. That’s great!


You know what else is great? If private schools followed the public schools’ lead, there might pop up a bunch of new, competitive, private junior colleges. It would be a whole new tier of education, but one predicated on the idea that the first two years of university could fairly be a lot cheaper than the third and fourth years.


And a happy byproduct would be that with only two-ish years of attendance from students, the “upper” universities wouldn’t be able to field competitive NCAA sports teams, and so it wouldn’t be worth it to keep competing.


Of course, some interests would want JUCOs to affiliate with “upper” schools so that, say, someone attending San Francisco City College and another person attending San Francisco State University would be able to play on the same sports team, but in my fantasy, the legislation creating this tiered system prohibits such partnerships.

14 September 2013

The Seattle Seahawks' schedule problem

By DA | at

I’m in an office NFL survival pool, so (because I take such things far too seriously) I mapped out my picks through Week 15, and in the course of doing so came across some particularly bad news for the Seattle Seahawks that, were I a Seahawks fan, would make me very put out.


This year, the Seahawks have FIVE 10am PT games. That is, they travel eastward and play at 1pm ET. In comparison, the San Francisco 49ers, their primary rival in the NFC West, will play TWO such games this year. For what it’s worth, the Oakland Raiders play four such games, and the San Diego Chargers play six(!), including two instances of back-to-back early games.


I couldn’t find anything about it, but I suspect the Seahawks will stay somewhere in the Central time zone between Week 4 and Week 5, since they play back-to-back 10am PT games in Houston and Indianapolis. That would mirror what the 49ers have done in recent years, staying in Youngstown, OH, between games in unfavorable time zones.


The entire problem stems from a stupid NFL rule: teams are required to arrive in the host team’s city on the day before a game. I’m not sure what the rule accomplishes, other than institutionalizing a home-city advantage. It’s not designed to keep team personnel in their home cities, because otherwise the 49ers couldn’t go to Youngstown.


Why not liberalize the rule and allow teams to arrange for themselves where they’re going to practice in the week before a game? If, after their Week 3 home game against the Jacksonville Jaguars the Seahawks want to fly out that night to practice at the University of Houston facility, or Rice’s fields, or at any of the FCS schools or junior colleges or high schools, what’s the problem with that?


There are plenty of reasons not to operate that way, I’m sure, but let the team decide that.


(Image cc-licensed: "12th Man Mural… GO SEAHAWKS!" by Joe Kunzler)

02 September 2013

Charlotte's stadium follies: public money for ego and circuses

By DA | at
image

Somehow, I missed this detail about the University of North Carolina-Charlotte’s football stadium, now named after Jerry Richardson:



The school had discussed seeking $5 million for temporary naming rights, with an eye toward renewing or signing another agreement after 15 years. Instead, Richardson came along with the $10 million offer and the stadium name was set in perpetuity.


Note: This was after Richardson asked local governments for money to help fund a remodel of the Carolina Panthers’ Bank of America Stadium, and eventually landed some $87 million. So, for $5 million, UNCC sold out its football stadium’s name in perpetuity rather than wait another few years to rinse and repeat. Awesome!


You know what else is awesome? The UNCC football stadium is nice, but didn’t have to be built. By its own calculation, the university borrowed about $40 million and raised the rest through other means, but what about the other options? What about BB&T Park, the new facility being built for the Class-AAA minor league baseball Charlotte Knights in uptown Charlotte?


Obviously, it wouldn’t work to put UNCC’s football team in BofA Stadium for most games right away, as they might only draw 20,000 people (the new stadium holds about 16,000, with plans to expand to about 40,000), but the university could have put money toward building BB&T in such a way that about 15,000 people could watch football there, and then once (if) UNCC gets popular enough, they could move to BofA Stadium.


It’s true that playing baseball in football stadiums is a terrible idea, but playing football in baseball stadiums has a long and proud tradition, and baseball stadiums tend to be far more pleasant places for spectators than football-only facilities. For example, see how AT&T Park, in San Francisco, has been arranged for college football games.


image

With minimal, if any, changes, BB&T Park could be set up in a similar way, with the football field running from the first base foul territory out into left field, and temporary stands erected in right field. Ideally, the field would be all artificial turf (the good stuff that acts, more or less, like grass; not the carpet, of course), as many minor league parks and football facilities use. But if you want to insist on a grass field, guess what? The minor league baseball schedule ends at the start of September, so there’s virtually no overlap!


I get it: the school wanted a nice shiny toy for itself on campus. However, as a public institution spending public money, it ought to have told Richardson (a.k.a. the dude that had just played hardball with the state for access to the public teat) to go jump in a lake.


And the school really ought to have considered subsidizing the Charlotte Knights’ stadium in exchange for a few tenant perks since, as the Knights point out on their own web site, the land for their new stadium is valued at around $24 million and is being leased for $1 per year. It would have been a win-win for everyone. (Except Jerry Richardson, as it should have been.)


It’s not necessarily easy to make money on college football, especially as part of a non-BCS conference, and this was an opportunity to try something truly revolutionary for a mid-sized city: Leverage one entity’s inability to go anywhere to help entice another entity to stay, while still giving the people the college football team that they appear willing the bankrupt themselves in order to get.


(Image cc-licensed: "DSC_6420" by DigiDreamGrafix.com)


(Image cc-licensed: "UNR @ AT&T Park" by Zack Sheppard)

05 August 2013

Playing games within video games: Breakout

By DA | at

After achieving a certain level of mastery over a video game, I often find myself making up new challenges to keep things interesting. I’m not alone. Perhaps the most infamous modern example is the dude who discovered he could pass an entire Call of Duty mission without firing a single shot.


So I asked some people to share the challenges they’ve made up. Here’s the first of those responses.


* * *



This dates back to the 1970’s. I was workng at Macy’s selling cameras and calculators, and our department (rather than the toy department Macy’s used to have) sold the first wave of home video games.


Pong! In your own home! On your own television! Only $80!


A year or two after Pong, but before its cartridge-based VCS 2600, Atari marketed a Video Pinball unit with three or four game choices built in. One of the games was Breakout.


The idea was to control a Pong-like paddle at the bottom of the screen to direct a ball up against a layered ceiling of bricks and knock as many out as possible before missing the ball for the third time. An obvious strategy was to break out a hole in all the layers at one end of the wall, then let the ball bounce back and forth between the top of the screen and the upper side of the wall, thus busting multiple bricks at each go. Knocking out all the bricks on a screen, where bricks in each layer had varying values, would earn 448 points, which is a perfectly logical number.


As I recall, once that was done, you’d be given a second go at it, only with a smaller paddle. I had enough free time to become particularly adept at the game. It got to the point where merely scoring the maximum of 896 points was routine, so I gave myself the challenge of completely clearing both screens of bricks with just one ball.


When that got too easy, I found myself physically pirouetting in place while the ball was in play, just to add to the hand-eye coordination challenge. Bounce the ball off the paddle. Spin. Find the ball and bounce it again.


(Image cc-licensed: "Super Breakout (1978)" by Tilemahos Efthimiadis)

24 June 2013

Delicious low-carb breakfast in 5 minutes

By DA | at

Get ‘yer bowl and coat with cooking spray.



Fill with egg whites as you see fit.



Microwave on high for about 2 minutes, then add awesome toppings.



Trust me: it tastes way better than it looks.

23 June 2013

Songs from the past 35 years with food as the central symbol or conceit, ranked

By DA | at
image

3,817) “Cheeseburger in Paradise” — Jimmy Buffett



721) “Milkshake” — Kelis



6) ”Peaches” — Presidents of the USA


5) “Cherry Pie” — Warrant


4) “Chicken Fried” — Zac Brown Band


3) “Tootsee Roll” — 69 Boyz


2) “Ice Cream” — Sarah McLachlan


1) “Candy Girl” — New Edition


(Image cc-licensed: "Ice Cream" by sea turtle)

12 May 2013

How to lose 35 pounds over 4 years

By DA | at
image

Month, Year / Weight


December, 2006 / 190 lbs


July, 2007 / 210 lbs


February 2008 / 215 lbs


January 2009 / 242 lbs


May 2009 / 203 lbs


September 2012 / 216 lbs


May 2013 / 207 lbs


Answer: Gain 17 pounds over 6.5 years.

12 April 2013

Nostalgia and sadness upon closure of a local branch of the second-largest coffee chain in the country

By DA | at
image

Caribou Coffee is in the midst of a major rebranding and restructuring effort. Part of it involves converting some outlets to new corporate cousin Peet’s Coffee, and part of it involves shuttering a bunch of stores. One of the stores slated for closure this Sunday is near and dear to me: the East Blvd. location in Charlotte, NC.

24 March 2013

Smoked turkey from The Que Stand in Harrisburg, NC

By DA | at

The best barbecue within ten miles of my home comes from a gas station. The Que Stand, in Harrisburg, NC, serves a variety of meats and traditional sides, and over the past few months, I’ve eaten more than my share of pulled pork, brisket, and baked mac ‘n cheese from there.


However, I’m trying to make better health choices, and so opted for the smoked turkey with mustard sauce, steamed broccoli, and red slaw this time around. Let’s just say this plate didn’t last another ten minutes.

02 March 2013

The Food Network's Chopped: Men and women

By DA | at
image

If you’ve watched the Food Network’s television show Chopped, you may have wondered, as I have, whether there are any competitive advantages afforded by the show’s format. For instance, is there a discernible advantage to cooking in the station closest to the pantry? What about types of chefs? Are sous chefs more likely to win than pastry chefs?


Without data, we can’t know, and I don’t have the data to study those particular questions. But I do have data to study at least one question. Do the judges give men an advantage?

21 January 2013

Manti Te'o, Lennay Kekua, and the politics of reporting inconvenient untruths

By DA | at
Manti Te'o Notre Dame

Here we are. A Heisman Trophy finalist, a player who led Notre Dame to the BCS championship game, and supposedly did it all while dealing with the grief of having his girlfriend die during the season, was at best a victim of a bizarre and inexplicable hoax, and at worst spun a vast and multifaceted web of lies to uncertain and improbable ends.

11 January 2013

"Lol" denigrates the phenomenon it purports to depict

By DA | at

(Guest post by Zachary Geballe)

I’m writing this with the understanding that it will undoubtedly make me seem like a hopelessly out-of-touch old person, one who can’t believe what those kids are up to these days. That may well be the case, but I’m going to do it anyhow, because I believe fervently that history will judge me to have been in the right all along.

I hate “lol.” It is the worst thing that the Internet has spawned, and I say that only slightly hyperbolically. I hate it not because it’s “chat-speak,” as I use “btw” all the damn time. I hate it because it is a complete and total lie.

02 January 2013

Django Unchained: We have to demand more

By DA | at
(Guest post by Ben Valentine)

image
I did not go into Django Unchained expecting to dislike it. Quite the opposite; I really, really wanted to like to like the movie.

Full disclosure: I’m mixed-race with African and European Jewish heritage. While my ancestors were not slaves in the American South, they were in the Caribbean. And the only Quentin Tarantino movies I’d seen before this week were Kill Bill: Volume 1 and Kill Bill: Volume 2, and I didn’t like them all that much.

Despite my hopes, I didn’t find Django satisfying. It wasn’t cathartic, even when it was telling me that’s how I should be feeling, and I left the theater struggling to articulate why. [Warning: spoiler alerts upcoming…]

03 December 2012

My three wedding rings

By DA | at

I bought my first wedding band in the summer of 2011. My then-fiancee and I went to a mall jewelry store and together picked out a titanium ring with tiny striations around the outside that looked like rainwater streaking down a windowpane. The inner loop of the ring was polished to a shiny smoothness, and the striations gave the outside a blunt, matted, look.

26 November 2012

Encircled

By DA | at
(Guest post by Zachary Geballe)


Many of the ancient Greek philosophers believed the circle was the most perfect form that existed. This notion did a great deal to inform their views on the universe, and has come down to us through any number of traditions. Even after the death of the idea of a perfectly circular universe died at the hands of Copernicus, Galileo, and others, the circle remains a potent symbol. Two recent films, Cloud Atlas and Samsara, explore the presence and potency of the circle in modern life.